Olympics-IOC stands agency in opposition to banning Russia regardless of threat of boycott



By Karolos Grohmann

BERLIN (Reuters) – The Olympic motion is dealing with its greatest dilemma because the Chilly Conflict: bow to calls for to ban Russian and Belarusian athletes or threat the primary mass boycott of the Video games in 40 years.

The Worldwide Olympic Committee (IOC) and a number of other of essentially the most highly effective nationwide Olympic committees hate the thought of a boycott of the most important money-spinner in world sport.

After hitting all-time low with reserves of round $200,000 after the 1980 Moscow Video games boycott, the IOC now has a staggering $5.6 billion in belongings.

Regardless of their concern of one other boycott, after that in 1984 massively undermined the occasion, it seems the IOC are ready to threat it with the intention to preserve their “non-negotiable” stance that the Video games stay above and past politics and that athletes shouldn’t be banned attributable to their governments’ actions.

Ukraine and its Japanese European and Baltic neighbours are main the decision for Russian and Belarusian athletes to be banned from Paris so long as Moscow’s troops preserve their invasion of Ukraine, which Belarus helped facilitate.

The IOC needs Russians and Belarusians to compete as “neutrals” – with no nationwide uniforms or flags.

On Monday, greater than 30 international locations together with the USA, Britain and France pledged their help for banning Russian and Belarusian athletes from worldwide competitions.

However Reuters’ conversations with a number of Olympic officers reveal widespread help for the IOC standing agency – regardless of it final yr initially handing the choice over Russian participation to particular person sports activities. The affiliation of nationwide Olympic committees additionally backs the IOC place.

“If the IOC banned athletes from international locations at warfare through the years, it could have violated the Olympic Constitution and wouldn’t have given the Video games its common character the place sport is above politics,” stated a president of a European nation’s nationwide Olympic Committee (NOC) that backs impartial participation of Russia and Belarus.

“Ukraine isn’t the one warfare or armed battle on this planet proper now,” the particular person added, talking on situation of anonymity. Another Olympics officers additionally pointed to what they noticed as hypocrisy in choosing and selecting which warring nations to exclude.

Ukrainian athletes accused IOC President Thomas Bach of being “on the fallacious aspect of historical past” after he requested them to drop threats of a boycott.

“We’ve got to perform our peace mission and that could be a unifying mission of bringing folks collectively,” responded Bach.


“For those who ever needed a definition of being caught between a rock and a tough place, the IOC has discovered itself there,” long-time former IOC advertising and marketing chief and present sports activities media strategist Michael Payne informed Reuters. 

    “For the IOC it has at all times been a pink line courting again to the boycott period, that the second governments resolve on who competes, you might be politicizing sport in a means that the genie is out of the bottle and you may by no means put it again.”

Including to the IOC’s tough place is the strain to keep away from a boycott from sponsors and broadcasters. They’ve totally modified the panorama because the mannequin for the 1984 Los Angeles Video games, boycotted by what was then the Soviet Union and its supporters, the place TV funding and sponsorship took off.

The IOC’s TV and sponsorship earnings for the 1980 Video games was lower than $100 million however from 2017-2021 it obtained $7.6 billion, over 90% of it from TV rights and sponsorship. Broadcaster NBC alone paid $12 billion for rights from 2014-2032.

Regardless of being Ukraine’s greatest ally within the warfare, Olympic heavyweights United States, which is able to host the 2028 Video games, is in opposition to a boycott, an official with direct data of talks at a current Olympic Summit informed Reuters.

“The USOPC (United States Olympic & Paralympic Committee) was adamant – there was completely no speak of a boycott from their aspect,” the official stated.

    What seems sure is that the IOC is not going to rush to take a last determination, with the July 26-Aug. 11 2024 extravaganza nonetheless a way down the street and with many qualifying processes not beginning till later this yr or subsequent yr.

(Reporting by Karolos Grohmann, Modifying by Mitch Phillips and Andrew Cawthorne)